Look for us on
Elliem Consulting
  • Home
    • Covid-19
  • About Us
  • What we do
    • Auditing
    • Training
    • Mentoring
    • Career Counselling
  • Books
  • Our Blog
  • Testimonials
  • Links
  • Our Policies
  • Doodles!
  • Small Business Saturday Video
  • On Line Training

Changes in Sentencing for Corporate Manslaughter

11/5/2015

 
This article, published on the excellent International Workplace website provides a comprehensive overview of the new sentencing guidelines which have been published today by the Sentencing Council.  The changes are significant and the impact they could have is far ranging.  Remember that a robust safety management system can help you to ensure that your business operates correctly - talk to us about OHSAS18001 certification if you feel you need to beef up your systems!

International Workplace say:

 'The updated guidelines aim to ensure a consistent, fair and proportionate approach to sentencing organisations or individuals convicted of corporate manslaughter, health and safety and food safety and hygiene offences and can be downloaded from the Sentencing Council website.
Offences that come under the guidelines are very varied and could include a building firm that causes the death of an employee by not providing the proper equipment for working at height, a restaurant that causes an outbreak of e. coli poisoning through unsafe food preparation, a manufacturer that causes injury to a new worker by not providing training for operating machinery, or a gas fitter whose sub-standard work leads to the risk of an explosion in someone’s home.

The publication of the guidelines ensures that, for the first time, there will be comprehensive sentencing guidelines covering the most commonly sentenced health and safety offences and food safety offences in England and Wales. Until now, there has been limited guidance for judges and magistrates in dealing with what can be complex and serious offences that do not come before the courts as frequently as some other criminal offences.

The introduction of the guidelines means that, in some cases, offenders will receive higher penalties, particularly large organisations committing serious offences – such as when an organisation is convicted of deliberately breaking the law and creating a high risk of death or serious injury. It is not anticipated that there will be higher fines across the board, or that they will be significantly higher in the majority of cases to those currently imposed.

The increase in penalties for serious offending has been introduced because, in the past, some offenders did not receive fines that properly reflected the crimes they committed. The Council wants fines for these offences to be fair and proportionate to the seriousness of the offence and the means of offenders.

In order to achieve this, the guidelines set out sentencing ranges that reflect the very different levels of risk of harm that can result from these offences.

Corporate manslaughter always involves at least one death, but health and safety offences can vary hugely; they may pose the risk of minor harm or lead to multiple fatalities. Food offences are also wide-ranging. They could involve poor hygiene or preparation standards in a restaurant kitchen that put customers at risk of illness or that cause fatal food poisoning.

The sentencing ranges also take into account how culpable the offender was. This could range from minor failings in procedures to deliberately dangerous acts.

While prison sentences are available for individuals convicted of very serious offences, most offences are committed by organisations and therefore fines are the only sentence that can be given.

The guidelines use the turnover of the offender to identify the starting point of the fine. Turnover is used as this is a clear indicator that can be easily assessed.

However, turnover is never the only factor taken into account. The guidelines require the court to 'step back', review and adjust the initial fine if necessary. It must take into account any additional relevant financial information, such as the profit margin of the organisation, the potential impact on employees, or potential impact on the organisation’s ability to improve conditions or make restitution to victims. This means sentences will always be tailored to the offender’s specific circumstances. Fines may move up or down or outside the ranges entirely as a result of these additional mandatory steps.

Legislation requires that any fine imposed must reflect the seriousness of the offence and take into account the financial circumstances of the offender. All factors being equal, a similar level of fine given to a large, wealthy corporation on the one hand and a sole trader with a modest turnover on the other would be unfair, just as the same speeding fine given to a premiership footballer and someone on an average income would not achieve the same level of punishment or deterrence.

The UK’s record on worker fatalities is good, but where such offences are committed, the Council believes fines should be available that reflect the seriousness of the offence. As well as causing fatalities, health and safety offences may risk or cause a wide spectrum of injury and illness, including a life-changing disability or health condition for victims.

While addressing remedial action with offenders is the responsibility of the Health and Safety Executive rather than the courts, the guidelines do provide for remedial orders to be made by the court in addition to or instead of punishment in cases where they may be appropriate. The guidelines also include a range of mitigating factors, which allow for voluntary positive action to remedy a failure on the part of offenders to be reflected in sentences.

The guidelines will come into force in courts on 1 February 2016.
According to Kathryn Gilbertson, Director at Greenwoods Solicitors LLP:
"This is a game changer - it’s not chitchat.  Courts will impose these fines.  Rather than run the risk, companies should seek specialist lawyers as soon as an incident occurs."

Comments are closed.

    Author

    thoughts on current business issues
    from a quality
    professional!

    Archives

    August 2018
    March 2018
    May 2017
    January 2017
    August 2016
    May 2016
    March 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    November 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Contact us
          ©  Elliem Ltd 2013
Photo used under Creative Commons from scott1723